How much does a human life costs? You can't give a value of life because life is priceless.
Almost
all the employees of Silicon Technotronics are guilty in this case. It seems
that people throughout the case articles would rather blame other people rather
than themselves. The succeeding sentences will present you the wrong attitude of
everyone who is involve in the project. The
project was not developed based on a realistic schedule and estimations. Both
Ray Johnson and Sam Reynolds realize that it was impossible to deliver the
product perfectly within the time constraint provided by the executives.
However, both Johnson and Reynolds were choosing to force their engineers to do
the impossible project, instead of trying to convince the executives that their
time constraint given to them was inappropriate. Ray Johnson would rather “stick” to his old
experience in manufacturing hardware and apply those same methods to software
development. Furthermore, he’d rather use Cindy as a means to preserve the
Robotics Division.”. Cindy Yardley collaborated with Ray Johnson to manipulate
the software results of the test. Ray Johnson
was unethically order Cindy Yardley to create fake test document by using his
power as Head of Robotics Division. This action was a violation of the code of
ethic since Johnson was asking his engineer to do such action that was
inconsistent with the code of ethic. Max
Worthington for allowing the communication between Yardley and Johnson without
any intervention or notifying the proper authorities. The above people
synergistically created the conditions of an uneventful event that was bound to
happen. Ray Johnson should be responsible and held accountable for Bart
Matthew’s death. Ray used his authority to manipulate Cindy for his own selfish
needs. He was fully aware of the problem with Randy Samuel’s program and he was
not going to let it hinder the project’s deadline. Ray is more concerned with
his job as head of the Robotics Division rather than the lives who are at stake
in the operation of Robbie CX30. Obviously, Ray placed a price on the life
which is nothing compared to the profits on the robot’s project. Cindy Yardley
would not have allowed Robbie CX30 out the door without passing the software
tests. She was in a way “blackmailed” in the sense that she had to go against
her moral values as a condition of her job and her co-workers. The weight of
the guilt was placed on Cindy’s shoulders. Randy is not only responsible. In
fact, the protocols have been damaged by Ray Johnson. Also, people in
Techtronics never inform the operator that the software has exceptional
conditions which were clearly stated in the requirements document.
Yes, they are all guilty in this
case but above all, I truly believe that real issue in this
case is who is the most responsible for allowing the Robbie CX30 to go out the
door without proper due diligence.
Source:
http://mybestessays.com/ethics-case-of-the-killer-robot-essay.html
